This blog post was written by Pam Derringer, news writer for SearchEnterpriseLinux.com.

Last week, lots of IT guys from New York’s biggest banks and stock brokerages took a day off to attend the sixth annual Linux/Open Source on Wall Street conference at the Roosevelt Hotel in the heart of Manhattan.

All ears they were, but suddenly attendees turned shy when the lectures ended and they were asked to share their own views on Linux. Surely, the firms’ PR police or legal watchdogs would find them out and ruin their prospects for career advancement. Promised a mask of anonymity, however, a few attendees opined on the show, and here are their thoughts.

Lack of management tools cited. “I’m a strong Linux advocate,” said one enthusiastic IT manager. “It’s free, open and secure. And if we find issues, we’re able to fix them.”

Five or six years ago, his firm was one of the first in financial services to introduce Linux servers to data centers. Now about 30% or 40% of its machines run on Linux, with most of the remainder running Windows. The firm’s direction, he said, is definitely off Unix and Solaris and onto Linux.

And he couldn’t be more pleased that Red Hat Inc., in turn, incorporated his team’s enhancements, such as changing storage allocations without a reboot into future versions of the operating system. This way, all Red Hat customers benefit and his staff doesn’t have to maintain the improvement separately with every future fix or upgrade.

He is also concerned about improving data center energy efficiency and has explored various options, to reduce energy consumption, including CPUs, memory and lower wattage.

He has also researched the stateless, single-image data center that can be booted up all at once. “Management would be much better,” he said. “We’d only have one operating system image to manage.”

What is Linux’ most telling shortcoming? “Enterprise-class management tools,” he answered, not unpredictably. “But the good news is: Linux is getting there.”

Rising support costs lamented. Another anonymous big-gun attendee said that for about six years his firm has used Linux — mainly Red Hat — on everything from mainframes to blades and servers.

“Linux is getting a faster, better infrastructure,” he said. “But if these vendors want to remain a viable solution, they need to remain competitive with other data center providers. They’re getting like everyone else, adding more middleware and getting more expensive. It’s getting so that the support and maintenance are costing more than the servers themselves. We need to drive competitiveness back.”

More third-party software urged. A third attendee said the main problem with Linux is the lack of third-party software and inadequate vendor support. For five or six years, he has used Linux to run Web applications and noted that the third-party software shortage is less severe for Web apps than for migrations off AIX or Solaris, for example, simply because of higher volume.

The good news is, he said, that vendor support is on the upswing, citing the presence of Oracle and IBM at the trade show.

“The demand for Linux is there but the growth of third-party software products is slower,” he said. “But we will start to see this [third-party software] materialize more and more.”

Just a few more comments about the OpenSolaris users-group meeting I attended recently.

First, I will say that I was impressed with the turnout and the overall presentation as put together by SUN. Clearly, SUN is trying to help the OpenSolaris community in a big way. Truthfully, I’m a little jealous of this, as I’m the group leader of the NY Metro POWERAIX/Linux users-group and I’ve yet to see a similar commitment on behalf of IBM to draw interest to our group.

Back to the meeting. There certainly was a lot of information presented and SUN clearly had hoped to articulate a vision of what their new world would like like. Unfortunately, most of their innovative vision was borrowed from Red Hat. The overall underlying message that most heard was, ‘if you can’t beat them, join them’. What they want to do is essentially copy Red-Hat’s two-system model; Enterprise and Fedora (one for pay, the other community supported), using that model for Solaris. Further, instead of trying to compete with Microsoft, they continue to be preoccupied with Linux and showing why they are better then them. This strategy did not work with Unix, as Sun clearly has not dethroned AIX or even HP-UX for that matter and we’re not certain why they think their new OpenSolaris model will dethrone Linux, or why they even feel they need to for that matter.

If I were SUN, I would just let the technology speak for itself, rather then try to reinvent other models.

The OpenBSD mailing list had some great news for that community yesterday: OpenBSD 4.1 is now available for download. The “what’s new page is far too long to list here, so you can get what I miss in my “executive summary” after the jump.

What’s new (in brief):

Improved hardware support, including:

• New USB client controller support:
• Support for the USB client functionality in the pxaudc(4) driver on the Zaurus.
• New usbf(4) midlayer for USB Client controllers.
• New cdcef(4) driver for providing a CDCE function on USB client controllers.
• New cas(4) driver for Sun Cassini 10/100/Gigabit Ethernet devices.
• New uow(4) driver for Maxim/Dallas DS2490 USB 1-Wire devices.
• New owsbm(4) driver for 1-Wire smart battery monitor devices.
• New zyd(4) driver for ZyDAS ZD1211/ZD1211B USB IEEE 802.11b/g wireless network devices.
• New moscom(4) driver for MosChip Semiconductor MCS7703 based USB serial adapters.
• New glxsb(4) driver for hardware random numbers and AES acceleration on the AMD Geode LX processor.
• New vic(4) driver for VMware VMXnet Virtual Interface Controllers.

More after the fold… Read more »

The blog’s been cooking with crazy Ubuntu news and Linux fragmentation conspiracy theories all week, but what’s been going down at SearchEnterpriseLinux.com?

Here’s a recap of the news and tips from this week:

CentOS lures Red Hat Linux users with update service
CentOS is wooing former Red Hat Linux users that loved software upgrades from the Red Hat Network but could have done without the expensive service contracts.

Ubuntu Feisty Fawn launches with increased server focus
Canonical Ltd. is hoping server virtualization features in Ubuntu Feisty Fawn will encourage more server deployments of the Linux distribution.

Unix-Linux printing
TIP - An expert walks users through setting up printing between Unix and Linux using Linux’s LPR utility and Unix’s SMIT.

Printer sharing between Windows and Linux
TIP - Figure out how to connect your Windows machines to a shared printer as a network device from your Linux box in this tip.

Have a good weekend, everyone.

Click the image above for an expanded, full size view of the Linux distribution timeline. On a related note, the image brings up an interesting point about fragmentation, doesn’t it? I’ll be digging into that topic a little bit deeper than with just an image later on, so stay tuned.

DesktopLinux.com has the scoop on CentOS 5, which was released this week. It features the GNOME desktop and a 2.6.18 kernel. CentOS is basically Red Hat Enterprise 5 without the branding or certification and support. The distro is based on the upstream release of RHEL 5 and includes packages from all variants, including Server and Client. All upstream repositories have been combined into one.

Major changes in CentOS 5 compared to CentOS 4 include:

• numerous updated software versions
• better desktop support with Compiz and AIGLX
• virtualization provided by the Xen hypervisor with Virtual Machine Manager and libvirt
• simplified construction of user profiles

Standard features include:

• Pidgin (formerly GAIM) 2.0 beta 5 messenger
• OpenOffice.org 2.0.4
• Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 email client
• GIMP 2.2.13 graphics editor

I’ve been conversing via the blogosphere with an IT administrator based in the U.K. about Nagios and CentOS today, and I must say it’s been an experience.

As you may know already, we posted a short case study about some SNMP-related trouble one IT manager was having with Nagios, and why he eventually went with a third party out-of-box application from Hyperic for monitoring and systems management.

Across the pond, Kieron Williams (that IT manager I mentioned above) is in charge of a small pub company called Brunning and Price. If the beer stops flowing, he has a problem, he said, but it’s not so much the case if, say, an email is 30 minutes late. Nagios works just fine for him in that regard, but it appears this popular open source monitoring project is only helpful to a point in enterprise environments, no?

The reason this conversation has been so helpful to me is because Kieron is also dabbling with CentOS due to some Microsoft Windows-related licensing headaches (quick aside: I think I’ve written the phrase “Microsoft licensing headaches” a gazillion times over the past three years at SearchEnterpriseLinux).

It just so happens that I’m putting together a CentOS piece for SEL due out this week or next. So, if you have anything to offer up on why you’d choose CentOS in your enterprise environment — or any CentOS stories for that matter — drop me a line at Jack Loftus, News Writer or fire off a comment below.

The Debian Project has announced the release (finally) of version 4.0 (codenamed Etch):

The Debian Project is pleased to announce the official release of Debian GNU/Linux version 4.0, codenamed etch, after 21 months of constant development. Debian GNU/Linux is a free operating system which supports a total of eleven processor architectures and includes the KDE, GNOME and Xfce desktop environments. It also features cryptographic software and compatibility with the FHS v2.3 and software developed for version 3.1 of the LSB.

It’s finally out, and not a moment too soon. With Ian Murlock calling the project a “process run amok” and Ubuntu gaining momentum everywhere but in the kitchen sink, things were getting a bit hectic.

UPDATE@10:35: Seems Debian also has a new leader as well. iTWire is reporting that Sam Hocevar, a French developer, who has been with the project since 2000, was elected as leader for 2007-08 on Sunday.

Downloads? Oracle doesn’t need no stinkin’ downloads!

OK, so I exaggerate just a bit, but in my defense this IS a blog. Oracle vice president of Embedded Technologies Mike Olson didn’t say anything of the sort today in his blog post defending Oracle’s Unbreakable Linux, but he did attempt to lay out a case as to why Oracle Enterprise Linux downloads (at 9,000 or so since launch) were the apple to Fedora’s oranges (24k per day).

“Counting downloads of Oracle Enterprise Linux is a waste of time,” Olson said, because Fedora downloads are typically people who have no intention of paying Red Hat for services or support anytime soon. On the other hand, Olson argues that those 9k or so Oracle Enterprise Linux downloads are customers — or “business buyers” — who are “willing to pay for support and bug fixes, and for ongoing access to pre-built, tested binary releases.”

For Olson, Oracle’s play wasn’t about getting RHEL out of the enterprise, it was about getting Oracle’s brand of Linux support in. The rest, if it ever happens, would be gravy.

Said Olson:

Oracle is able to offer services to enterprise users who already have RHEL installed. This is crucial. The leading role of the RHEL distribution in the enterprise is exactly why Oracle chose to support it, and not some other distribution, in our Unbreakable Linux support offering. Enterprises running RHEL today can switch to Oracle’s services without downloading a new copy of the operating system. Naturally, any enterprise running production systems is reluctant to reinstall anything at all in order to switch vendors. It’s just too risky to change the tires while the car is moving.The effect is that Oracle is able to convert downloads to paying customers without requiring a download.

If you remember, this is something SearchEnterpriseLinux.com covered earlier in the week. Senior analyst Raven Zachary of the 451 Group said the movement on this issue going on today was early adopters only, but he expected that to change. Expect that change, if it does in fact occur, to arrive about the same time as Red Hat’s support renewal cycles.

And just one last note: I wonder how Olson’s tune would sound if it was Oracle Enterprise Linux that was enjoying 24,000 downloads a day, and not Fedora? I wonder…

Hot on the heels of their first foray into the world of heterogeneous systems management, Xandros has announced the completion of a Windows-based version of Xandros Management Console (xMC). The company said in a release that the new version remotely manages Linux servers from any networked Windows Vista or Windows XP client.

That’s great for Xandros that they’re expanding their application suite to encompass the new version of Windows, but a quick scan of the headlines today says no one is upgrading to Vista. Sure, people know about it, but making the upgrade isn’t in the cards just yet. Linux vendors must be licking their chops.